" ( michel foucault , 1970 : 216 ) to answer this question , the archeology ( genealogy ) of knowledge was developed out , by which foucault took granted the tragic experience conflicts in western societal space since 18th century as the aftermath of ( institutionalized ) knowledge discursive practice : driven by " the will to truth " , a speaker or social action endeavors to analysis , define and cultivate human being " s life , however the result in what he has done is but rather to impose human beings of " a system of exclusion " , which was most famously illustrated in the work of madness and civilization , that all kinds of crazy ideal and performance , which had been existing and being cherished as the very authentic nature and feelings of human beings in societal space or art composing before 18th century , were categorized into irrational items ( insanity ) , then , pu t into an alienated space gate - headed with so called " civilization " , which was founded on psychology , psychoanalysis and other modern knowledge ( michel foucault , 1973 ) 他首先將西方十八世紀以來的經(jīng)驗及其沖突理解為“知識話語”實踐的后果,言外之意,可以透過“知識化的話語” ,來觀察西方教化/社會空間中的經(jīng)驗沖突:在“求知意志” ( thewilltoknowledge )或“求真意志” ( thewilltotruth )的驅動下,話語者試圖認識、界定和改造人類的經(jīng)驗,但實際上,這樣做的后果卻是將“排斥機制” ( asystemofexclusion )施與人類,即否定所有不符合“求真意志”及其話語構成規(guī)則的各種異類想象、感受、欲望與活動,使之統(tǒng)統(tǒng)以知識話語所描繪的狀態(tài)存在。在這一點上,最明顯的例證莫過于將各種“瘋狂”言行與體驗一并界定為“非理性” ,然后對其實施“理性的控制與改造” ( michelfoucault , 1973 ) 。